Charles Darwin – An Honest Scientist?
Part 2 Here: (D)evolution Theory – Another Marxist Fraud?
“When Darwin presented a paper to the Linnaean Society in 1858, a Professor Haugton of Dublin remarked, `All that was new was false, and what was true was old.’ This, we think, will be the final verdict on the matter, the epitaph on Darwinism” (Fred Hoyle and N. Chandra Wickramasinghe, 1981, Evolution from Space, p. 159).
In this article about Darwinism and the Theory Of Evolution we will start by looking at some famous names of Darwinism and see whether they were honest and upright men of science. Next we will take a look at the striking similarities of Darwinism and Marxism which both occurred at approximately the same time in the western world. Finally we will look at some objections to the Theory Of Evolution. Since most people, including myself, grew up with the belief that man came from apes, it is pretty inconceivable to imagine that the whole Evolution Theory is a frail concoction of conjectures and empirical evidence absent and in many cases fabricated forgeries by members of the elite in order to kill divine belief and make people fight each other and destroy our civilization in line with the Marxist doctrine.
First of all we will see what current research states about the personal life of Charles Darwin and his honesty.
We know that good people don´t tell lies so the first thing to scrutinize concerning the Theory of Evolution is Mr Charles Darwin. Consider a recent article which states that Darwin stole the idea of the Theory of Evolution from another researcher and that he told many lies to prove his primacy over the other researcher called Patrick Matthew. Dr Mike Sutton, a criminology expert at Nottingham Trent University, has spent years cross-referencing the passages in both books, checking citations, and studying the influential figures who influenced both men.
“Contrary to Darwin’s claim that Matthew’s ideas went completely unnoticed, the newly discovered data proves that his book was, in fact, widely advertised and read,” said Dr Sutton.
“I have no doubt, based on the weight of new evidence, that Darwin did read Matthew’s book and then went on to replicate his discovery and key themes.
Darwin lied when he wrote in his defense in the Gardeners Chronicle in 1860 that :”…neither I nor apparently any other naturalist had heard of Mr Matthews’ views…”
Patrick Matthew had written a book 30 years before Darwin in which he described ‘the natural process of selection’ explaining how ‘a law universal in nature’ ensured the survival of the fittest.
Sutton´s book ‘Nullius’ further proves that Darwin told six deliberate lies in order to achieve primacy over Matthew and reveals for the first time his desperate attempt to have the codified rules of scientific priority changed so that better known scientists such as he would be awarded priority over lesser known first discoverers such as Matthew. Moreover, all eight of Darwin’s excuses for why he supposedly had no prior-knowledge of Matthew’s prior-published discovery are all proven to be completely fallacious.
Having destroyed the myth of Darwin the honest gentleman of science, ‘Nullius’ examines further new bombshell discoveries in light of earlier discoveries of Darwin’s dishonesty in stealing the ideas, given in confidence, of his Edinburgh tutor, Grant, and his notorious editing of the second edition of the ‘Voyages of the Beagle’, which fuelled the myth that he discovered natural selection on the Galapagos Islands rather than a year or two later where he really found it – inside books between 1837 and 1838.
If you think Galapagos finch beaks had anything at all to do with the discovery of natural selection then you, like millions of others, have been hoodwinked by Darwin’s great science fraud.
Mike Sutton´s book is called ‘Nullius in Verba: Darwin’s greatest secret’ and it´s published by Thinker Media Inc. USA. Here is a recent article on the topic of Darwin´s frauds: http://thedailyjournalist.com/theinvestigative/world-s-greatest-science-fraud-darwin-and-wallace-newly-proven-to-have-plagiarised-theory-of-natural-slection/
It is also wellknown that Erasmus Darwin, Charles grandfather, was a freemason of very high levels but his father was also a member of the masons. Nobody has so far confirmed that Charles was also a freemason but we do know that he had all the family bonds to masonry from his relatives and his financial life was extravagant to say the least. Darwin lived as a gentleman on a huge estate with up to eight servants. Yet he received no wages from employment, and earned only about 10,000 pounds from his books during his lifetime. Darwin did receive an inheritance from his father, but not enough to maintain such a grand standard of living.
Very few books have discussed Darwin’s personal finances, and only one did in detail: Darwin Revalued (1955) by Sir Arthur Keith. This rare book disclosed that Darwin made a fortune through investments. Reviewing Darwin’s ledgers, Keith reported: “I note that in some of his earlier dealings there were small losses, but in all his later investments there were only gains, some of them on quite a big scale. Could Darwin’s triumphant investing have resulted, not from fortuitous newspaper picks, but careful guidance by financial powers? Might this also explain his son’s good fortune in landing a bank partnership? And as mentioned before many of his ancestors were high level freemasons to add to the already extensive smoke around Mr Charles Darwin.
Ernst Haeckel (1834–1919) was a German professor of zoology and marine biologist, as well as a qualified medical doctor who was involved at the University of Jena during most of his academic lifetime. Haeckel was an icon of Evolution Theory and his schematics of embryos have been published in virtually every schoolbook. Yet he was proven to be a fraud already during his own career and he even admitted it.
During the trial, Haeckel confessed that he had altered his drawings, but excused himself by saying: “I should feel utterly condemned and annihilated by the admission, were it not that hundreds of the best observers and biologists lie under the same charge. The great majority of all morphological, anatomical, histological, and embryological diagrams are not true to nature, but are more or less doctored, schematized and reconstructed” (Bowden, Malcolm (1977), Ape-Men: Fact or Fallacy? (Bromley, England: Sovereign Publications), p. 128)..
This is quite sensational since Haeckel as a world famous figure in the Theory Of Evolution, implicates the whole academic elite worldwide of fabricating evidence for the Theory Of Evolution. Where there is smoke there is fire…
First row, Haeckel’s original 1874 Anthropogenie embryo sketches. Second row, some of Richarson’s published photos of embryos,5 showing Haeckel to have done forgeries.
Piltdown Man: An Orangutan Jaw and a Human Skull
Piltdown man – a fake human skull to prove Theory Of Evolution
In 1912, a well-known doctor and amateur paleoanthropologist named Charles Dawson came out with the assertion that he had found a jawbone and a cranial fragment in a pit in Piltdown, England. Even though the jawbone was more ape-like, the teeth and the skull were like a man’s. These specimens were labelled the “Piltdown man”. Alleged to be 500,000 years old, they were displayed as an absolute proof of human evolution in several museums. For more than 40 years, many scientific articles were written on “Piltdown man”, many interpretations and drawings were made, and the fossil was presented as important evidence for human evolution. No fewer than 500 doctoral theses were written on the subject.
It was determined that the teeth in the jawbone belonging to an orangutan, had been worn down artificially and that the “primitive” tools discovered with the fossils were simple imitations that had been sharpened with steel implements. In the detailed analysis completed by Joseph Weiner, this forgery was revealed to the public in 1953. The skull belonged to a 500-year-old man, and the jaw bone belonged to a recently deceased ape! The teeth had been specially arranged in a particular way and added to the jaw, and the molar surfaces were filed in order to resemble those of a man. Piltdown man quickly disappeared from the British Museum.
The Neanderthal Fraud
Professor Reiner Protsch – Fabricated Data
A famous Neanderthal fossil was discovered in a peat bog near Hamburg, Germany. Prior to its discovery, the evolutionary timeline of ape-like creatures remained extremely “fuzzy” as it approached modern man. There simply were not any fossils that shed light on this period. But a single discovery dated by Professor Reiner Protsch cleared up the picture… He dated the skull at 36,000 years old, allowing it to fall neatly into the evolutionists’ timeline between Neanderthals and modern man. Finally, thanks to Protsch, the gap had been filled. All the pieces were in place.
For evolutionists, it was too good to be true. And indeed, it was. On February 18, 2005, Protsch was forced to retire in disgrace after a Frankfurt University panel ruled he had “fabricated data and plagiarized the work of his colleagues” (see “Anthropologist Resigns in ‘Dating Disaster,’ ” 2005). Once believed to be a world-renowned expert on carbon dating, Protsch’s entire professional career is now being questioned. The university noted: “The commission finds that Prof. Protsch has forged and manipulated scientific facts over the past 30 years” (“Anthropologist Resigns…”).
The Horse Fraud – Still In Our TextBooks
It has been proven that horses didn´t follow the evolution as shown in the picture above. Still people print it and show it as truth in textbooks. This is yet another instance of the militant promotion of the Theory Of Evolution despite its fallacies in many empirical aspects.
Dr. Niles Eldredge, curator of the American Museum of Natural History, said:
“I admit that an awful lot of that (imaginary stories) has gotten into the textbooks as though it were true. For instance, the most famous example still on exhibit downstairs (in the American Museum) is the exhibit on horse evolution prepared perhaps 50 years ago. That has been presented as literal truth in textbook after textbook. Now I think that that is lamentable …”.
Darwinism Is The Scientific Foundation Of Marxism – A Proven Fraudulent Theory
Where is the connection between Darwinism and Marxism? We could begin with the fact that Erasmus Darwin as a top freemason was implicated in the French Revolution, the precursor of communism that became freemasonry´s gospel in the 19th century. Every revolution in Europe was supported by freemasons. Below we see that Charles Darwin held Karl Marx in extremely high regard and it´s quite obvious where his political sympathies are. It also indicates that Charles Darwin belonged to the same elite Secret Society in Europe as Karl Marx.
“Dear Sir:
I thank you for the honour which you have done me by sending me your great work on Capital; & I heartily wish that I was more worthy to receive it, by understanding more of the deep and important subject of political Economy. Though our studies have been so different, I believe that we both earnestly desire the extension of Knowledge, & that this is in the long run sure to add to the happiness of Mankind.
I remain, Dear Sir
Yours faithfully,
Charles Darwin”
Letter from Charles Darwin to Karl Marx
October, 1873
Karl Marx set out the link between Darwinism and communism as follows:
“Darwin’s work is most important and suits my purpose in that it provides a basis in natural science for the historical class struggle.” (Letters: Marx-Engels Correspondence, vol. 2, p. 126).
The mass murderer Lenin said:
“The whole theory of Marx is an application of the theory of evolution—in its most consistent, complete, well-considered and fruitful form—to modern capitalism.” (V. I. Lenin, State and Revolution, New York: International Publishers Co., Inc., 1932.).
Karl Marx said:
“…this is the book that contains the natural-history foundation of our view point.” (Marx and Engels, Letters, p. 426)
The Chinese communist dictator Mao, who slaughtered vast masses of people, openly described the heretical ideology he based himself on:
“CHINESE SOCIALISM IS BASED ON DARWIN AND HIS THEORY OF EVOLUTION.” (K. Mehnert, Kampf um Mao’s Erbe, Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt, 1977)
Stalin said:
“There are three things that we do to disabuse the minds of our seminary students. We had to teach them the age of the earth, the geologic origin, and Darwin’s teachings.” (Kent Hovind, The False Religion of Evolution, http://www.royalse.com/scroll/evolve/ndxng.html)
Communism and Darwinism are intimately connected, as they were created by exactly the same people to explain the social life and for the scientific proof of Marxism. This also explains why the Theory Of Evolution is defended to the very end by the neomarxist world power today. The “survival of the fittest” theme in Darwinism fits in perfectly with the “class struggle” of Marxism. Both theories focus on the struggle of the individual against perceived “enemies” as for instance other classes. Both theories believe in violence and killing of your enemies. None of them realize or admit the power of group harmony and compassion to other people. They perceive man as merely a physical animal and that the strongest man will succeed. However, in the history of mankind it has turned out that China blossomed during the Tang dynasty when Buddhism and its mandatory compassion for other people was promoted widely along with. It was said that there was no need to lock the door in China because people were so good from their hearts.
In their earlier book, Darwin, Adrian Desmond and James Moore summarize thus:
“‘Social Darwinism’ is often taken to be something extraneous, an ugly concretion added to the pure Darwinian corpus after the event, tarnishing Darwin’s image. But his notebooks make plain that competition, free trade, imperialism, racial extermination, and sexual inequality were written into the equation from the start–‘Darwinism’ was always intended to explain human society.
Moreover, the theory of evolution proposes that development in nature is possible thanks to conflict (in other words “the struggle for survival”) and supports the concept of “dialectics” which is fundamental to communism.
If we think of the communist concept of “dialectical conflict”, which killed some 120 million people during the 20th century, as a “killing machine” then we can better understand the dimensions of the disaster that Darwinism visited on the planet.”
A very interesting read is the book of Richard Wurmbrand “Marx & Satan”where we discover that Marx was a Satanist priest with a deep hate of God and desire for the ruin and annihilation of the human society. How can we explain this deep hated nourished in the hearts of these men? Was it satanic possession?
I will close with this fact — at the funerals of Karl Marx, in his speech Frederich Engels compared Marx to Darwin as titans of the human mind, and this suggests the high probability that Darwin and Karl Marx were “Secret brothers of the same secret society”.
To mention Darwinism without mentioning the communist conspiracy would be like mentioning a foundation without a building on top of it. The infamous Protocols of Zion made Darwinism a foundation stone of the global communist conspiracy against mankind 120 years ago:
“We are constantly, by means of our press, arousing a blind confidence in these theories… Do not suppose for a moment that these statements are empty words: think carefully of the successes we arranged for Darwinism.” (Protocols 2:2-3)
While we are not going to blame jews for the Protocols Of Zion we do know that the document has proven the global conspiracy against mankind true since everything in the document has become true after 120 years – no matter which group of people that really were behind it. Communism has taken over almost every country of the world while they still call themselves Liberals, Social Democrats, Conservatives or other names. In practice they support the communist manifesto.
Part 2 Here: (D)evolution Theory – Another Marxist Fraud?
In Part 2 we discuss the scientific question marks around the Theory Of Evolution.