(D)evolution Theory – Man Becomes More Stupid Over Time – 2016-10-29…

Five hundred million year old footprints suggest prehistoric civilizations

world_iq_graph_jpg

Statistics shows man becoming more and more dumb in contradiction to the Theory Of Evolution.

Part 3 Of This Series: Evolution Disproved By Ancient Civilizations?

Many research studies show that average IQ score of man has been dropping alot in recent decades. Despite a more ”advanced” education and endless hours spent in school man gets more and more dumb. This is of course in complete contradiction to the Evolution Theory. As we saw in our first article Charles Darwin was a proven liar on multiple occasions and lived like a king on a huge estate after presenting his Theory of Evolution. Is his theory of Evolution yet another marxist scam? We will try to show the basic faults of the Evolution Theory in this article.

 

Part O1 Of This Series: Charles Darwin – An Honest Scientist?

 

”To suppose that the eye with all its inimitable contrivances for adjusting the focus to different distances, for admitting different amounts of light, and for the correction of spherical and chromatic aberration, could have been formed by natural selection, seems, I freely confess, absurd in the highest degree.” – Charles Darwin

 

It is clear that not even Darwin himself had full faith in the Theory Of Evolution. He couldn´t imagine how the eye could have been evolved naturally. In fact, since the Theory Of Evolution has never been observed by any human being it must be considerred a religion and not science.

 

”I fear the day that technology will surpass our human interaction. The world will have a generation of idiots.” (A. Einstein)

 

According to Physics, man will devolve and not evolve over time since all systems tend toward more and more chaos and disorder. We see the same thing happen in modern society with more and more technology, medicines, vaccines, conflicts, desires etc creating lazier, weaker and dumber human beings who have falling IQ scores despite more schooling than ever. Einstein in his days already predicted that man would become a fool as man relied on technology for survival.

Is Evolution Theory A Conspiracy Against Man?

We are constantly, by means of our press, arousing a blind confidence in these theories… Do not suppose for a moment that these statements are empty words: think carefully of the successes we arranged for Darwinism.” (Protocols 2:2-3)

 

Since 1897 when the Protocols of The Elders Of Zion were published they have claimed that the whole idea of Darwinism is a conspiracy against mankind. Considerring that almost all parts of the protocols have become true today we should have an open mind to the possibility of Evolution being yet another marxist scam.

 

After studying the Theory Of Evolution I know that one cannot discredit, in a few paragraphs, an idea which the elite have spent billions to indoctrinate society with.  But let’s look at it with a free mind without any notions from religion or materialism. We will try to use our common sense to look at it at a level that ordinary people can understand.

We will discuss some objections to Evolution Theory from a scientific standpoint. We will go through some of the most important question marks and compare with today´s society to see whether they seem right or not.

First of all, the Theory of Evolution is a theory which states that life evolved from simple life forms into more complex life forms on earth. It supposedly took billions of years and ended in the human being as the most advanced life form.

 

lightning_createlife

Evolution Theory: A flash of lightning may have created the first life according to scientists. Do we really believe that?

The main objection to the Theory Of Evolution is how the first life, ie a single cell, was created. Life comes from life as everyone knows. Has anyone ever seen chemicals giving birth to life? Furthermore a single cell is extremely complicated at the microscale. Current suggestions include chemical processes causing human life to occur but so far nobody has never been able to reproduce life by mixing chemical substances. You could say that the main issue of the evolution theory is the issue of whether life has a soul or not. Can anything live without a soul? So far the scientists couldn´t create life and I expect it to never happen since a single cell is infinitely complicated at a micro level.

 

fruit-flies

Banana flies can change color but they can´t become a new species.

Secondly no experiments could create a new species from an existing species. It is easy enough to alter some characteristics of a species but so far nobody could make a bird out of a banana fly. And there have been many banana flies breeded, many more than there were ever monkeys on earth.

 

meisterprints-trilobite

Human footprints from Utah about 500 million years old with a trilobite fossil at the arrow. According to biologists it is accidental and no footprint. 

In addition we can´t explain the stunning traces of prehistoric civilizations. How could they build such gigantic structures tens of thousands of years ago and how could their art be so advanced with depictions of dinosaurs, flying saucers etc? How could they produce iron with a purity far beyond what modern man could produce? These questions can never be addressed properly by the Theory of Evolution. In part 3 we will take a look at the multitude of evidence for prehistoric civilizations far more advanced than our current civilization.

 

rabbit-population

Rabbits and foxes show a typical sinusoid population curve.

Furthermore, there are no linear processes in nature over long periods of time while the evolution theory suggests that man evolved from simple life forms to advanced life forms during billions of years. Usually species go extinct over time with DNA mutation and environmental causes.

 

transitional-fossils

Transitional fossils are missing causing evolutionists to claim that evolution took place in ”spurts”. Well, that supports the theory of multiple civilizations, each one created at the outset.

In addition to that we are missing transitional fossils. For example, how could a fish walk up on land without lungs? Did he suddenly grow a lung and crawl up on land?

Dr Patterson had written a book for the British Museum simply called Evolution.2 Creationist Luther Sunderland wrote to Dr Patterson inquiring why he had not shown one single photograph of a transitional fossil in his book. Patterson then wrote back with the following amazing confession which was reproduced, in its entirety, in Sunderland’s book Darwin’s Enigma:

‘I fully agree with your comments on the lack of direct illustration of evolutionary transitions in my book. If I knew of any, fossil or living, I would certainly have included them. You suggest that an artist should be used to visualise such transformations, but where would he get the information from? I could not, honestly, provide it, and if I were to leave it to artistic licence, would that not mislead the reader?’

He went on to say:

‘Yet Gould [Stephen J. Gould—the now deceased professor of paleontology from Harvard University] and the American Museum people are hard to contradict when they say there are no transitional fossils. … You say that I should at least “show a photo of the fossil from which each type of organism was derived.” I will lay it on the line—there is not one such fossil for which one could make a watertight argument.3 [Emphasis added].

 

Physics: From Order To Disorder

 

chaos-from-order

Physics predict disorder from order. Evolution predicts order from chaos. Modern society is falling into chaos in line with the laws of Physics.

According to physics all systems evolve from order to disorder. It is the same with DNA mutations that they almost exclusively make a life form worse, step by step. Hence the very limited life span of a civilization(maximum a few tens of thousands of years based on calculations of our DNA mutation rate). Here the scientists argue that all mutations were good and gradually evolved a single cell to a human being over billions of years. How likely is that? Mathematically there are many experts who claim that it couldn´t have happened. Darwin claimed life began eons ago from chance chemical processes. From the first living cell, all life evolved.  This might have been plausible in Darwin’s day, when cells were considered simple.  But no longer.  Even a bacterial cell requires thousands of different proteins ­- each composed of hundreds of amino acids in precise order.  Francis Crick, who co-discovered DNA’s structure, estimated the odds of getting just ONE protein by chance as one in 10 to the power of 260 – a number beyond imagination.

 

dna-mutation

DNA mutations cause species to go extinct over time

If we calculate the DNA mutation rates we observe that mankind would become extinct after maximum 30 000 years. And yet biologists claim that we evolved for billions of years. Doesn´t it make more sense that the earth has had multiple civilizations and then experienced a great disaster before again growing into a civilization and then declined until the next disaster struck us? This is the only model which can explain the fossil finds.

 

materialist-devolution

Modern man: weaker than ever, more selfish than ever, more vain than ever.

Finally, and this is my favourite question mark, take a look at modern man. Is he advanced, strong and full of vitality? Or is he becoming dumber and weaker by the day? Weren´t ancient people stronger and more evolved? An ancient farmer had to work hard every day, he was full of gratitude for each meal he received and he had to master all kinds of skills such as building houses, taking care of animals, giving birth to babies and animals, curing diseases and hunting in the forest. Modern man goes to the super market and gets his food. He is fed all his information through a digital screen and he gets all the necessary vaccine shots to protect himself against diseases.

Look at the number of useless attachments and emotions in modern man. Aren´t they at least ten times more numerous than in ancient people? The modern man must check the Internet, he must eat special foods, he must travel to an exotic country every year, he must have a car, an IPAD, a big plasma screen and an Iphone. Furthermore he must operate himself to improve his looks and he must become rich in order to impress on other people. His wife must be beautiful. He can´t take good care of his family and he will divorce when he is fed up with all the conflicts with his wife and he will leave his kids to grow up with a single mom. He feels depressed and lethargic at least 2 months per year and at that time he will often stay at home from work. He is obese and he easily gets upset by minor problems in daily life such as someone pissing him off in traffic.

 

Would you say modern man is more evolved than the ancient man? No. He is infinitely more primitive and we all know it in hearts. Not only that. He is a full fledged materialist who only cares about himself and his material gains. Divine faith is all forgotten for the average man and he regards himself as the most powerful and intelligent being in the Universe despite his horrible character and his ridiculously small size in the Universe. He is not humble and his modern life is a living hell although he would never admit it. All of what we see happen in modern society contradicts the Evolution Theory and this is factual.

 

So do the big changes (macroevolution) really happen?  Evolutionists tell us we cannot see evolution taking place because it happens too slowly.  A human generation takes about 20 years from birth to parenthood.  They say it took tens of thousands of generations to form man from a common ancestor with the ape, from populations of only hundreds or thousands.  We do not have these problems with bacteria.  A new generation of bacteria grows in as short as 12 minutes or up to 24 hours or more.  There are more bacteria in the world than there are grains of sand on all of the beaches of the world.

There is much variation in bacteria.  There are many mutations (in fact, evolutionists say that smaller organisms have a faster mutation rate than larger ones17).  But they never turn into anything new.  They always remain bacteria.

 

At this stage many readers realize that what you were taught in school originating from an ape might not be hundred percent true. It might be that the Evolution Theory is just another great hoax carried out by the elite to destroy the moral standard and divine faith of human beings. The ”survival of the fittest” theory in the so called ”science of Evolution” is perfect to pit man against man causing more and more conflicts in society. 

3 Trackbacks & Pingbacks

  1. The Supernormal Causes Of Faith And Atheism... 2016-11-17 - expandourmind
  2. Evolution Theory Disproved By Ancient Civilizations? Part 3 - 2016-12-19... - expandourmind
  3. Evolution Theory A Marxist Fraud? Part 1 - 2016-10-09..... - expandourmind

Kommentarerna är stängda.

UA-72897725-1